There Is No “Manual vs Automated Testing” Conflict - Cassandra H. Leung

-

I’m a little bit frustrated. Since Twitter died and I decided to start engaging on LinkedIn more, I keep seeing posts that perpetuate this idea of “manual” vs automated testing; us vs them.

 

There is no versus. Your civil war is manufactured. There’s room for everyone and we all want the same thing: good quality.

 

I’m frustrated by posts which pit people against one another; which disparage human testing; which claim automated checks bring less or no value; which distract us from actually improving quality.

 

Testers are specialists. Automation is a tool. Specialists use tools. Not every tool is right for every job. A specialist knows which tools to use and when. What’s the problem here?

 

I specialize in exploratory testing. I’ve written some automation before and I’m actively working to improve those skills, not because I want to replace my exploration, but because I want to contribute more to making more room for it.

 

Think of making things; physical things. Some things get mass produced and others are hand-crafted. One is not better than the other or universally more suitable, they’re just different. Say I want to sell tables and be the destination for all your table needs. My customers have individual needs. I could mass manufacture tables in a factory, but that can be expensive to set up and a bit overkill. I could make them completely from scratch, but that can be slow and boring. I know. How about I have the most popular models mass manufactured and hand craft the more unique, innovative pieces. I don’t need to go to the extreme of making the nails and collecting the wood myself; I can buy those in and still create something that’s never been seen before.

 

I can automate the checks that need to be performed in the exact same way the most often. I can explore to discover new risks. I can use tools to generate test data or mock conditions. There is no war.

 

The real issue I see is people and companies not understanding the relationship between human testing and automation. It doesn’t need to be a hostile one, because it’s not an “either or” situation. It’s a supportive one.

 

If I only mass produce the same few tables, I’m missing a big part of the market. If I only hand craft, it gets expensive and I don’t have time to build the unique pieces or innovate. I don’t have to pick just one or the other. I can use both to my advantage to get the best results.

 

I can see that it’s frustrating when other people and companies claim that human testing can be replaced by automation, or even AI. We, as humans, naturally get defensive and want to justify our existence. But I don’t think arguing against one another is the answer; education is.

 

Stop fighting, start uniting, and work together towards your shared goal.

 

 

What do you think about this “conflict” – is the potential for its existence already enough for the threats to be real?  Share your perspective in the comments.


There is No "Manual vs Automated Testing" Conflict (cassandrahl.com)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHAT ARE THE ROLES OF A SOFTWARE TEST MANAGER

-
  In our previous post, we discussed the roles and responsibilities of a Software Test Analyst. As mentioned, the Analyst supports the Manager in the testing activities and processes. Now we are going to discuss the role of a Software Test Manager. A Software Test Manager is responsible for overseeing and managing the entire testing process within an organization or a specific project. They have wider range of responsibilities to make the testing process as seamless as possible.  A Software Test Manger assumes the following roles in a testing project/teams:   1. Test Strategy and Planning: Every project starts with implementation strategy and planning. This determines the success of a project. Test Managers develop a comprehensive test strategy and test plan for each project or product. This includes defining the scope of testing, objectives, timelines, resource allocation, and risk assessment.   2. Team Management: They are responsible in the recruitment, ...
Read more

EVERY TESTING NEEDS A HUMAN TOUCH: WHY AUTOMATION ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH

-
Automation testing has revolutionized the way we test software by enabling rapid execution of test cases, efficient bug detection, and improved overall product quality. In a rapidly changing tech ecosystem where speed, efficiency, and accuracy are paramount in software development, adoption of new automation tools and frameworks have has increased significantly in recent years. However, despite the need to automate testing for faster deployment, the fact remains that every software testing endeavor needs a human touch. To better understand the importance of human element in every software testing, there is equally a need to understand the role of using automation tools in software testing especially in a large-scale software development. Understanding the Role of Automation for testing Automation in software testing refers to the use of specialized tools and scripts to execute predefined test cases, perform repetitive tasks, and validate software functionality automatically. By adoptin...
Read more

The True Purpose of Testing - Artem Zakharchenko

-
Image
Let me ask you a question: What are the automated tests for? Whether you’ve written some tests in the past or not, you’ve likely heard that tests can be useful. And I know you’ve also heard stories about tests that are more of a chore and nuisance than any help. Frankly, I believe both parties are right! But to understand why, I will first let you in on a little secret. No test is inherently useful just because it exists. A test becomes useful when it fulfills its purpose. So, what is that purpose exactly? As the name implies, automated tests are here to help us automate something. We take a particular state of our application, perform some actions, and check the resulting system to be what we expect. That’s what any test does, and yet some tests are more useful than others. There is precisely one thing that defines and controls that difference. The intention Just as every piece of code exists for a reason, every test exists to verify the intention behind that code. A paragraph is rend...
Read more